Translation vs. interpretation for public meetings: what's the difference?

People use “translation” and “interpretation” interchangeably, but for a clerk planning a public meeting the difference decides who you hire, what equipment you need and what residents actually get. Here is the translation vs. interpretation distinction in plain terms, and how to plan for each.

The short version

Captions are text, so live translated captions are translation, even though they happen in real time. SentraCaptions provides captions and translated captions. It does not provide spoken (audio) interpretation or an AI voice.

Translation vs. interpretation in practice

Written translation

This covers documents residents read: agendas, notices, instructions for joining by phone or internet, and webpages. It's prepared ahead of time, so there's room for review before anything is posted.

Live translated captions

Speech recognition creates English captions about one second after speech, and machine translation turns them into other languages. Residents read along on the chamber screen or on their phone. There's no scheduling per meeting, and up to 8 languages can run at once. The tradeoff is that automatic captions and translations contain errors, and quality varies by language.

Simultaneous interpretation

The interpreter speaks at nearly the same time as the speaker, usually into a headset system that listeners wear. It keeps the meeting moving but needs equipment and, for long meetings, sometimes more than one interpreter per language.

Consecutive interpretation

The speaker pauses, and the interpreter repeats what was said in the other language. It needs no special equipment and works well for a single resident at public comment, but it adds time to that person's remarks.

When each one fits

How SB 707 uses the terms

SB 707 (Durazo), signed October 3, 2025, uses both words, and the difference matters. Most new requirements for eligible legislative bodies (including city councils of cities with 30,000 or more residents, or cities in counties of 600,000 or more, and boards of supervisors of counties over 30,000) start July 1, 2026. Among them:

SB 707 does not itself require live captions. Live translated captions are a practical way to support its language-access and participation goals. Confirm with your city attorney or county counsel whether your body is covered and what “reasonably assist” should look like for you.

Planning for both

  1. Decide your baseline. Many agencies run live translated captions at every meeting and translate agendas into their applicable languages.
  2. Write a request process for interpreters. Tell residents on the agenda and your public meetings webpage how far ahead to ask and whom to contact.
  3. Plan for residents who bring their own interpreter. Decide where they sit, how they'll hear clearly, and how timing works at public comment so it doesn't disrupt the meeting.
  4. Review machine translation quality. Have a fluent speaker check the languages that matter most to your community.
  5. Keep the record straight. Transcripts from captions, in every language as TXT or SRT files, can help staff prepare minutes. They are not official minutes, and they're not a certified translation.

Agencies that run meetings in CivicCA can let it start captioning when the meeting starts and pause it for recess and closed session, so translated captions are there for residents without extra steps for the clerk.

Keep reading